‘Stage Beauty’ (2004): A favorite Restoration drama (Saturday Film Review)

Standard

936full-stage-beauty-screenshot

Claire Danes and Billy Crudup as theatrical dresser Maria and celebrated actor Edward “Ned” Kynaston in the 2004 American-British-German production “Stage Beauty.”  Their characters are based on the real Kynaston and Margaret Hughes, who become the first woman to take on leading female roles in the period.

Set in early 1660’s England during the reign of Charles II,  this sumptuous, sometimes bawdy and often thought-provoking romantic costume drama focuses on the changes wrought in the lives of a proud and narcissistic actor known for his “stage beauty” roles, and a star-struck young female dresser who longs for what is forbidden at the time: a career on stage.

There is an obvious attraction between Ned and Maria, who can barely conceal the clear adoration she feels for the actor.  Ned, however, is a  charming flirt who dallies with both men and women and is currently involved with handsome, dashing George Villiers, the Duke of Buckingham (Ben Chaplin).

Kynaston’s sexuality in the film is ambiguous. Taken off the street as a small child by a “tutor” who trained many young boys in the art of playing a stage beauty, he seems most comfortable playing the female on stage and in life. His lover Buckingham clearly sees him as a woman, asking him to wear Desdemona’s flowing fair locks during their liaisons. Ned is proud of his ability to convince audiences it is quintessentially a woman they see on stage whenever he performs.

w964

The affection Kynaston has for his pretty young dresser is evident, but his attentions are divided.

chaplin_crudup

Following a tryst, Buckingham (Chaplin) shares a copy of the broadsheet promoting Mrs. Hughes with his lover, Ned Kynaston,

However, the times, they are a-changing. Ned is surprised to learn a certain “Mrs. Hughes” is appearing at a London tavern, playing the very Shakespearean female roles for which he is famous, and drawing crowds.  But surely she can hardly be a threat to the celebrated Ned, so schooled in all the arts of playing a woman? And anyway, women are forbidden to appear on a legitimate stage. Why should he worry?

stagebeauty012

Stage-Beauty-claire-danes-787487_1800_1204

At a dinner, Kynaston discovers the mysterious Mrs. Hughes is, in fact, his own Maria, who has been moonlighting at the tavern. An arrogant Ned is quick to display his incredulity that his dresser could possibly play the part of Desdemona with any  believability.  “What is the art in a woman playing a woman?” Ned asks.

936full-stage-beauty-screenshotzoetapper

However, the King’s feisty mistress, former orange-seller Nell Gwynne (Zoe Tapper, pictured above) champions Maria’s cause and encourages Charles to not only allow the dresser to play the role on stage, but to also consider banning men from playing any female roles.

stage-beauty-2004-13-g

 Sir Edward Hyde (Edward Fox) listens as King Charles II (Rupert Everett) issues a proclamation that from hitherto, all female roles will be played by women–a great blow to “stage beauty” Kynaston.

Maria, as the first of her kind, a genuine stage beauty, becomes the toast of London, admired by luminaries such as diarist Samuel Pepys (Hugh Bonneville) and immortalized on canvas by court portraitist Sir Peter Lely (Tom Hollander).

Ned’s fortunes, however,  take a definite turn for the worst. Shut out from playing the only types of roles he knows, beaten for making a foppish aristocrat look a fool and reduced to performing bawdy songs in a seedy burlesque theatre to earn a crust, Ned has fallen far from grace.  Maria reaches out to help the man for whom she still cares deeply.

Will Maria be able to help  Ned resurrect his career and will he help her with her own weaknesses as a performer? And can Ned learn to find satisfaction in playing masculine roles on stage–and perhaps, in life?

Stage_Beauty_2003_3

Maria takes in Ned after his Fortune turns an unfavorable face on him.

x7NWBVRkus2mHvCbnIN0Q7rXX45

The chemistry between Danes and Crudup is palpable; the two actually left their respective partners for each other and for a time became an item offscreen during the filming.

At the time Stage Beauty premiered, many reviewers targeted is as another film where a gay man is “turned straight” by the love of a good woman. This is a simplistic view.  In a time when sexual roles were not so clearly defined and intimate attachments could be formed with members of the same sex  without necessarily experiencing society’s reprisals, Ned in the film isn’t defined as being “straight” or “gay.” The character’s sexuality has a certain fluidity, shall we say. The film also closes on an ambiguous note that is perfectly in tune with the rest of the script.

Stage Beauty is an entertaining fictionalized account of some real-life figures during a fascinating period of English history. It offers a witty, literate script, strong performances by the two leads, and many fine supporting performances by faces familiar to those who love British/period drama. It’s one of my favorite films and one too frequently underrated by the critics.

And now, for the real Kynaston and Hughes . . .

436px-Edward_Kynaston

The real Edward Kynaston (1640-1712) was thought to be a bisexual who had liaisons with both women and men, including the Duke of Buckingham. Later, he married and had children. Unlike in the film, Kynaston actually played both male and female characters earlier in his career, but was particularly noted for playing a convincing female (in spite of some issues with his voice). He was described by Samuel Pepys as “the prettiest woman in the whole house” and “the handsomest man.” He also continued to have success on stage even after the introduction of actresses into the theatre.

481px-Lely_margret_hughes

Margaret Hughes (c. 1645-1719) described as a “mighty pretty woman” by contemporaries, has frequently been credited as the first professional actress on the English stage. Hughes played Desdemona in a performance of Othello in 1669 seen by Pepys. She was 25 at the time her portrait was painted by Lely, a scene featured in the film. Margaret had several lovers, but the most famous was Prince Rupert, Duke of Cumberland, also known as “Rupert of the Rhine.” She had a long-term affair with the Duke and bore him a daughter, Ruperta, whom he acknowledged. For years, Margaret lived a lavish lifestyle with her lover, who left the bulk of his estate to Margaret and Ruperta. Her continued love of gambling and the good life led to rather straitened circumstances later in life.

The film is based on the play The Compleat Female Stage Beauty by Jeffrey Hatcher, who also wrote the film’s screenplay.

About fedoralady

I'm an LA native--Lower Alabama, that is. My husband of more than 30 years and I live here on a portion of my family's former farm with two gorgeous calicos and a handsome GSD mix. My background is art education, and over the years I've been a teacher, department store photographer, sales associate and a journalist. My husband, his business partner and I have Pecan Ridge Productions, a video production company, for which I shoot & edit video and stills and manage marketing. I also still write part-time for the local paper. I love movies, music, art, photography and books, and my tastes in all of them are eclectic.

10 responses »

  1. <3Hugh Bonneville, Rupert Everett, Tom Hollander…I like Claire Danes, she has that aura of purity or naivety..I don't know how to describe it. I have to see this movie,thanks Angie.

    • Yeah, also Tom Wilkinson, another favorite character actor of mine, plays a theatre manager. I know what you mean about Claire. Even in her role as a bi-polar CIA agent in Homeland, there is this feeling when she is in her manic mode that she’s some sort of avenging angel. She looks really lovely in the period costumes here, too. I’ve been thinking about writing this one for a while–I pulled screencaps a while back. I want to try to feature a different film every weekend.

    • Thanks!! Yes, it’s a shame it isn’t better-known, which is one reason to write a review and get the word out. 😀 I think the lack of critical enthusiasm for it back when it was released didn’t help. It’s as good or better than some period films that received much more acclaim.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s