For most of the year, my TV is likely to be tuned into Investigation Discovery for a good whodunit, PBS for the classy Masterpiece Theatre or a thought-provoking documentary, or BBC America for fantastical fun via “Doctor Who.”
But somehow, come late November, this gal’s thoughts turn in the direction of sweet, snow-capped sentiments, predictable plotlines, sprightly holiday tunes and Norman Rockwell-esque small town Americana at its finest, where the denizens never meet a stranger and often speak with distinctly Canadian accents.
Yes, I fall down the rabbit hole of Hallmark holiday films, and willingly so. They may frequently be sappy, corny and require the viewer to suspend their disbelief, but there’s just something about them that makes me come back for more.
What can I say? I have always loved Christmas and I’ve always had a sweet tooth.
(All images courtesy of Crown Media)
The holiday movies are pretty much non-stop on both the Hallmark Channel and Hallmark Movies and Mysteries this time of year, with a dozen or more new ones churned out every annum for Thanksgiving and Christmas, almost all of them filmed in Canada (hence those distinctly North of the Border vowels).
I find I can go about my business online, doing photo and video edits, creating and flogging my Crick Bank Kitty merchandise, working on humane society projects and have one of these films playing in the background without it being a distraction from RL work. I don’t have to hang on to every word or every visual to know how it’s all going to end. Into every life there comes a need for some feel-good fluff.
The films usually star actors who had hit TV shows in the US back in the ’80s or ’90s, or beloved character actors in supporting roles (these folks often steal the show). One of the leads might come from a stable of Canadian actors who have become familiar faces to me and my fellow sugar addicts. Make no mistake, there are some genuinely talented folks who appear in these films (and often make them watchable in spite of lackluster/ludicrous scripts). Let’s be honest, though–you don’t find a lot of current A- or even B-listers roaming around the set of a Hallmark film. Certainly not one of the oft classically-trained Brit actors I so admire.
So I have to admit I was surprised to see RA’s former “Spooks” co-star Rupert Penry-Jones in one of the Hallmark Channel’s new holiday offerings for 2015, “Crown for Christmas.” The film pairs Rupert with Danica McKellar, formerly of the dramedy “The Wonder Years” and reality show “Dancing with the Stars.” Danica plays an aspiring artist who scrapes by as a maid at a ritzy big city hotel–a job from which she is fired when she tries to help out her sister and fellow maid. But never fear, Danica’s honesty (she turns in the pricey Rolex left by a certain distinguished guest) leads to her being whisked off to Europe to serve as a governess to a princess.
Naturally, with his delicious English accent and tall, regal good looks, Rupert plays
Prince Charming, er, King Maximilian, the widowed ruler of a mythical European kingdom. He has troubled connecting with his little princess, Theodosia, who, in turn, acts out and drives one governess after the other out of the castle. Do we all know where the plot is going from here? Of course, we do. The adorable fish-out-of-water American lass wins the hearts of the child, the staff and ultimately, the king himself. And they live happily ever after . . .
Yes, I know, it’s been done before, over and over, variations of the same theme. And Danica, while lovely, is, at 40, probably a little long in the tooth for this particular role (something else common to these films–actresses and actors are frequently cast in roles more suitable to performers a decade or two younger).
But I found I did enjoy this offering more than some of the Hallmark holiday fare (there are a few so wretchedly scripted and acted I just can’t force myself to watch. Avoid the Santa films with Steve Guttenberg at all costs).
Rupert definitely brought some class and nicely understated acting to the role. Only a handful of reviews so far, but it’s got a solid 7.2 on IMDB, considerably better than most Hallmark films (admittedly, most of the reviewers seemed to watch primarily for RPJ). Rupert also had truly nice chemistry with the talented young actress playing his daughter, who actually looked as if she might be his offspring.
So, I have to ask myself–would I mind it if Mr. A showed up in a Hallmark film? Would his fans mind? Would there be thudding and squeezing or weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth–or some of both?
No doubt he’s done some controversial roles before (thinking of the polarization caused by “Hannibal”) and likely will in the future, because we know he’s not content to play the same type of character over and over again. And I think he rather enjoys surprising his fandom with some of his choices. He does maintain a sense of humor about it all.
And he hasn’t actually played a human king . . . 😉 Or maybe they could bring back RPJ for a second “Crown” film with RA as his royal cousin looking for love . . . hmmmmm.
(Tongue firmly tucked into to cheek tonight, dear ladies. Have a wonderful week!)
I’ll watch RA act in anything…a Hallmark production, a reading of the phonebook…literally anything. lol
Oh, so will I—he could recite the multiplication tables and I would be transfixed. 😀 As much as I admire the way the man does darkness and angst, sometimes I do find myself longing for a nice, fluffy little film where he gets the girl and a happy ending.
Is this a trick question? Well of course I would watch a Hallmark production with RA in it!
I’d be embarrassed but I’d watch.
Can I say though that I am impressed they cast an age appropriate actor to play RPJ’s love interest. Full marks to Hallmark, I say.
I feel embarrassed admitting I watch so much of their stuff, but I still watch it. And would certainly watch RA in one of their productions! 😀
Actually, I had no problem with Danica being cast opposite RPJ, and they made a very striking couple–the problem is the screenwriters for Hallmark routinely write the characters as younger, but use actors and actresses who clearly aren’t twentysomethings in those roles. They also had an actress who is at least 40 playing a young doctor hoping for a residency at a certain prestigious hospital. They need to expand their horizons a little, methinks.
I remember one where Andrew McCarthy is supposed to be a young executive on the rise dating the boss’s ditzy daughter. He looks old enough to be the actress’s daddy, instead of her date. I felt embarrassed for AC with the frequent references to his “youth.” The actress portraying the character with whom he ultimately falls in love, his dance teacher, is a much better match.
Hmmm . . . maybe we should write to Hallmark and tell them to cast more classy British actors no longer wet behind the ears for roles in scripts that feature age-appropriate love interests . . . and suggest they find better scriptwriters. 😉
Oh, I admit to the same guilty pleasure! I love me some sap! But I don’t get to see them here (don’t have Hallmark) so I’ve watched some on YouTube in the past. Perfect no-need-to-think fare for an evening when you’re absolutely tired. This “Crown for Christmas” one sounds right up my alley! Thanks for the tip. And I wouldn’t mind seeing Richard in some sappy movie at all! I like him to play all sorts of roles with all sorts of challenges and he’s never done something so sappy before so wouldn’t that be a nice challenge? 😉
Yep, I think you will definitely enjoy it. And there are days like that when you just want to watch something that won’t tax your brain. You know, Richard once said we all need some silliness in our lives from time to time, so surely sappiness is also necessary? 😉 And yes, a great challenge–how to flesh out a role in a Hallmark rom-com . . . 😉
Exactly! I’m sure he’d find a great way to give…erm… body… to such a character. 😉
Yes, indeed! 😀
If he did one, it would be the highest rated Hallmark Christmas drama ever.
Without a doubt, it would. And think of the DVD sales . . . they might be able to afford to increase those million dollar-per-picture budgets. 😉
Everybody’s got make some money somehow …
So true. And there’s obviously an audience out there for these films . . . I went to a tree lighting and concert tonight in the south end of the county and came home to watch—a Christmas movie (although this was on UP, not Hallmark, and set in San Francisco instead of some picturesque snowbound town in the heartland.) 😉
I love the Hallmark Channel XMAS movies! And I have definitely wanted to see “A Crown for Christmas”–even more so now with your synopsis and review.
But I wish that Hallmark Channel would allow more streaming of their movies–even if they give us commercials. I suppose that I could buy a new remote for our tv, but I prefer to watch on my laptop. Ha!
You will certainly enjoy it, Grati, it’s definitely one of the better ones out of this year’s crop of new holiday films.
Our internet out here is on the slow side, requiring a lot of buffering, so live streaming doesn’t work well for us. I wish it did–we have Amazon Prime, and I could watch lots of stuff here on my laptop or on my Kindle Fire if this wasn’t the case. And basically it is our only internet option unless we go with a much pricier satellite internet package. Oh well–at least it is better than dial-up! ❤